<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Duct Tape Marketing - Latest Comments in Engagement Without Velocity is a Lot of Work</title><link>http://ducttapemarketing.disqus.com/</link><description>Small business marketing from Duct Tape Marketing</description><atom:link href="https://ducttapemarketing.disqus.com/engagement_without_velocity_is_a_lot_of_work/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:49:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Engagement Without Velocity is a Lot of Work</title><link>https://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/engagement-without-velocity-is-a-lot-of-work/#comment-8131936</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@melanie - thanks - you know I'm a big fan of AideRSS and I do think your tools answers some of this already as it shows another layer of engagement well beyond subscribers only.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ducttape</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:49:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Engagement Without Velocity is a Lot of Work</title><link>https://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/engagement-without-velocity-is-a-lot-of-work/#comment-8131935</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;"The problem I wrestle with in this argument is that it must start with the supposition that's every blogger and social media player has the very same goal."&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That totally nails the results of a lot of conversations I had with the bloggers covered in the list we analyzed. Some thought it was really engaging; some thought it was pretty cool and had a lot of questions (which were a great education for me); and some reflected your statement above -- that it wasn't necessarily what they track (or at least not the most important thing).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Adjacent to that is the fact that some really valuable stuff -- interpersonal interactions -- take place off the grid, as it were, in formats like email, or evolve from online venues to offline ones, where we can't track systematically at all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's definitely part of the opportunity of the metrics "space", I think, given that things are so embryonic yet. Ilya, our CTO, has said he thinks the solution to RSS, filtering, engagement measuring, metrics, etc. will be a variety of applications that can work in combinations, and given how many different sets of priorities I've seen, I'm certainly inclined to agree.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Melanie Baker</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:43:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Engagement Without Velocity is a Lot of Work</title><link>https://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/engagement-without-velocity-is-a-lot-of-work/#comment-8131934</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post, John.  Thought I'd share this article on engagement which someone just forwarded to me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://knowledge.emory.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1153%23" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://knowledge.emory.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1153%23"&gt;http://knowledge.emory.edu/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jodi Kaplan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:15:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Engagement Without Velocity is a Lot of Work</title><link>https://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/engagement-without-velocity-is-a-lot-of-work/#comment-8131933</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is an interesting point.  I do believe sales is the ultimate goal of any marketing plan, however there are many metrics that measure success.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nascar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:26:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Engagement Without Velocity is a Lot of Work</title><link>https://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/engagement-without-velocity-is-a-lot-of-work/#comment-8131932</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Big numbers are useless without engagement and "velocity." I agree wholeheartedly. There is no way big numbers can hurt, as in this case. It may even help and seem more impressive (social proof).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If I'm given the choice, I'd choose both numbers and engagement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This really is not an either/or question. There is nothing that will will take engagement away just because you have high RSS subscriber numbers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hendry Lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:02:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Engagement Without Velocity is a Lot of Work</title><link>https://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/engagement-without-velocity-is-a-lot-of-work/#comment-8131931</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The RSS and storytelling ROI numbers can be misleading, but engagement and sales are real measures of successful marketing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zoyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:51:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Engagement Without Velocity is a Lot of Work</title><link>https://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/engagement-without-velocity-is-a-lot-of-work/#comment-8131930</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All of this discussion (both here and on Brian's &lt;a href="http://Copyblogger.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Copyblogger.com"&gt;Copyblogger.com&lt;/a&gt; blog earlier today) point toward the need for a next generation of metrics to measure marketing success.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the modern, online world, it's on-going customer/reader relationships that count more than simple uniques, RSS subscribers, or sales based on coaxing a customer into a one-off transaction.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, how do you measure the success of a relationship?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As you're suggesting, that requires a more complex set of metrics than we have today because the beauty of interacting with real people directly is you never are 100% certain what outcome (positive or negative) may result.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There have always been lots of ways to casually evaluate relationships in our personal lives but now marketers are confronted with the challenge of measuring them on a vast scale to determine ROI.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Fox, Author of Internet </dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:09:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Engagement Without Velocity is a Lot of Work</title><link>https://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/engagement-without-velocity-is-a-lot-of-work/#comment-8131929</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, this post was philosophic and gave me much to think about.  I did look at that AideRSS list and was shocked to discover that on my own I had found about six of those sites!  And I'm a newbie at this.  I will put a wrinkle in things though, as far as counting things like trackbacks and comments and such...I just wonder how many blog readers are like me who don't know what a trackback is and so I might read a post with great interest but not comment.  Also I don't "do" RSS feeds yet because I don't really know what they are or how they work.  So I've just admitted to my kindergarten level expertise!  And yet I'm pursuing a marketing strategy online...go figure!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LindaBusiness</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:33:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Engagement Without Velocity is a Lot of Work</title><link>https://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/engagement-without-velocity-is-a-lot-of-work/#comment-8131928</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Brian - thanks for stopping by - I sort of remember in Physics class it having to do with both speed and direction - something we all need to keep in mind. Been a fun topic so far!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ducttape</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:29:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Engagement Without Velocity is a Lot of Work</title><link>https://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/engagement-without-velocity-is-a-lot-of-work/#comment-8131927</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Velocity... I like that. We all need momentum to reach our marketing objectives, and that's an excellent way to characterize when you've finally hit the slipstream of influence (and sales).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Clark</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:21:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Engagement Without Velocity is a Lot of Work</title><link>https://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/engagement-without-velocity-is-a-lot-of-work/#comment-8131926</link><description>&lt;p&gt;RSS is a very tricky topic. On one hand, I find myself using Google Reader to stay on top of certain news. It allows me to "fly" through the content and pick out the best bits to read. So from a user perspective, I definitely encourage other users to embrace RSS rather than manual checking. And if I get a few days behind, I just mark everything as read and move forward. Which brings me to the other hand, that is the engagement. I clearly am more engaged with some blogs than with others and I think that this would hold true with most RSS fans. Some sites get my attention more than others.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So yes, the numbers will be suspicious as you suggest. Maybe the old adage that "50% of my marketing isn't working, I just don't know which 50%" still applies to the Internet, even though we have such great metrics from email marketing and Google analytics available to us.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Howard Yermish</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:01:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>