-
Website
http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog -
Original page
http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2007/12/06/sell-the-result-not-the-tool/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Mike Stenger
9 comments · 26 points
-
Ari Herzog
11 comments · 26 points
-
Andee Sellman, One Sherpa
11 comments · 1 points
-
Drew Schiller
13 comments · 1 points
-
ducttape
329 comments · 9 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
7 Reasons Why Small Businesses Should Take a Look at Foursquare
3 days ago · 29 comments
-
Free Live Training Facebook for Small Business
11 hours ago · 2 comments
-
Is Social Media Killing Your Business?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
Six Pixels with Mitch Joel
1 day ago · 3 comments
-
What Small Business Needs to Do to Get Ready for Mobile Marketing Now
1 week ago · 33 comments
-
7 Reasons Why Small Businesses Should Take a Look at Foursquare
Selling a stud finder as a tool for decorating (like having example uses on the back), seems fine, but actually naming it a decorating device, seems, well over the line and more likely to tick people off.
SHE FOUND A STUD...
Okay, all joking aside - the marketing of this "everyday" tool is unique in that they packaged the benefit instead of the product... I think it was a great approach. And they probably didn't sell any to contractors or professional designers, but the thousands of DIY addicts, wandering, glossy-eyed through Home Depot, may see it a say... "Whoa, cool."
Great find, John.
Keep Cooking
Andrew
Making you do a double-take from time to time is a good think I think!
You did catch me on that statement. I was reacting to an earlier comment that claimed that he thought this kind of packaging was a tad dishonest because you were just calling something common by a new, fancy name to get more people interested in it.
What I was trying claim is that if someone doesn't know what a laser level is (the truth) then it couldn't really be dishonest to repackage it as a decorating kit to appeal to them.
Can you light without dark, can you know joy without sorry, can you . . .no I wasn't really meaning to head down any path that might get that deep.
We could debate the moral, ethical and philosophical branches of the statement as they might pertain to the world as a whole, but I'm too tired from hanging Christmas lights for that right now.
In fact, even if someone knows what a laser level is, I see nothing dishonest in packaging it in a way that highlights a particular use for a specific (perhaps untapped) market.
I wasn't meaning to head down the much-wider and more complex path of the moral, ethical and philosophical aspects of the statement either. That's exhausting just thinking about it.
It simply struck me, from a marketing perspective, as a statement that was out of alignment with who you've demonstrated yourself to be here on your blog.
Thanks for taking the time to clarify the comment, John. I hope you're enjoying a lazy Sunday now that the Christmas lights are hung.
"It simply struck me, from a marketing perspective, as a statement that was out of alignment with who you've demonstrated yourself to be here on your blog."
thanks for noticing!
I totally agree and although the world started shifting from product orientation to customer orientation over two decades ago, some of us still bury ourselves in the feature function richness of our products as opposed to how they help the customer get rid of a particular pain that the customer is suffering from.