-
Website
http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog -
Original page
http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2009/01/14/seth-godin-thinks-youre-boring/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Mike Stenger
9 comments · 26 points
-
Ari Herzog
11 comments · 26 points
-
Andee Sellman, One Sherpa
11 comments · 1 points
-
Drew Schiller
13 comments · 1 points
-
ducttape
329 comments · 9 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
7 Reasons Why Small Businesses Should Take a Look at Foursquare
3 days ago · 29 comments
-
Free Live Training Facebook for Small Business
11 hours ago · 2 comments
-
Is Social Media Killing Your Business?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
Six Pixels with Mitch Joel
1 day ago · 3 comments
-
What Small Business Needs to Do to Get Ready for Mobile Marketing Now
1 week ago · 33 comments
-
7 Reasons Why Small Businesses Should Take a Look at Foursquare
Dan and Deanna "Marketing Unscrambled"
Cheers
Joe
http://zachheller.com/2009/01/15/hire-a-social-...
Thanks guys. And thanks to Seth for his notorious "constructive criticism".
McGraw-Hill is publishing the paperback, which will be released this June.
Content marketing is a very timely subject - as you know.
jp
In reality, NOTHING. That's why it's our job as marketers to find and create reasons to make things interesting and exciting.
As always, Seth delivers the goods!
Seth's comment only relates to your market sector and those who are your potential clients.
The other day I bumped into someone Seth Godin may call “boring” -- a woman who approached me for money. Her “pitch” was not remarkable, her cause was not remarkable, nor her career. She was not in a remarkable location wearing remarkable clothes. She didn’t “wow” me with the results of her fundraising campaign or the return on my investment or how the marketplace was discussing her or her campaign.
She didn’t have a blog, let alone internet access, and couldn’t have paid for it if it were available. She and the child she had with her didn’t strike me as remarkable, maybe just malnourished?
Remarkable doesn’t imply value; it is just as likely to be on the right side of the bell curve as it is to be on the left. Would she have to choose more hungry, more poor, more underserved to be remarkable, to get the marketplace to care?
Sprinkle some good value behind “remarkable un-boring” discussions and hopefully this will appropriately influence the marketplace.
Since remarkable is the exception on both the yin and yang side of average, I hope we don’t encourage marketers to strive for it without more importantly striving for the underlying value of what being on that edge means. Could it be that unremarkable isn't as boring as unworthiness? OK, I may be way too naïve with my analogy, but I would hope that an unremarkable small business woman campaigning for a real and worthy need would be less “boring” than a very remarkable, unworthy campaign (and a lot of folks could probably give me great examples of those). I would hope she wouldn’t need to be remarkable for her share of the pie.
I feel that remarkable is not a choice -- it could be a consequence and if so, let’s at least equally promote being very cognizant and respectful of the value our contribution makes along the way?
http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/01...
The best part: oh, they may rest in peace
Brilliant! :)
I have linked this interview on my blog on my speaker profile. Members check in with regularly as my profile is the most active on this site.
I do hope a couple of people stop by, as this is a first class interview.